By Amy Dalrymple | Editor

Michelle Wagner, left, carries boxes of signed petitions for a proposed ballot measure to make public school breakfasts and lunches free in North Dakota on April 9, 2026, at the Capitol. To her right are Amy Jacobson and Ashley Gaschk, other members of the measure's sponsoring committee. Together for School Meals has reported nearly $1.1 million in monetary support for the measure. (Photo by Mary Steurer/North Dakota Monitor)

By Jack Dura

Millions of dollars from national and in-state groups have gone into campaigns telling North Dakotans how they should vote this fall on whether to make it harder to change the state constitution and provide free meals to school children.

Measure 1 would require at least 60% of voter support to amend the state constitution. Measure 2 would provide free school meals to K-12 students.

Together for School Meals, the group behind Measure 2, reported nearly $1.1 million in monetary contributions this year. There does not appear to be organized financial opposition to Measure 2.

Protect the North Dakota Constitution, which opposes Measure 1, has reported more than $1.2 million of donations. StrongND Fund has spent $978,000 in support of Measure 1.

National groups such as the Fairness Project and the National Education Association have given to both groups. The Fairness Project has spent more than $1.12 million against Measure 1 and $600,000 to support Measure 2. The National Education Association gave $50,000 to Protect the North Dakota Constitution and $250,000 to Together for School Meals.

Prairie Public News Director Dave Thompson moderates a debate with North Dakota U.S. House candidates Trygve Hammer (D), from left, Helene Neville (I), and Charles Tuttle (I) on Oct. 8, 2026. (Photo by Rick Gion/Prairie Public)

By Michael Achterling

Three challengers for North Dakota’s U.S. House seat listed their priorities during a debate Thursday on Prairie Public while criticizing the Republican incumbent for not participating.

Democratic-NPL U.S. House candidate Trygve Hammer and independent candidates Helene Neville and Charles Tuttle made their case to voters and showed their differences on the issues.

Republican incumbent Rep. Julie Fedorchak did not participate. In a statement, Fedorchak said she agreed to a one-hour debate with Hammer, but withdrew after Prairie Public added two candidates and planned to extend the debate to 90 minutes.

When Neville and Tuttle became qualified U.S. House candidates, Prairie Public added them to the already-scheduled debate because the station invites all candidates on the ballot, regardless of party, CEO John Harris said in a statement.

Liquid kratom extracts and capsules containing 7-OH are displayed for sale at a smoke shop in Buffalo, N.Y. A growing market is prompting state lawmakers to reconsider how the substance should be regulated. (Photo by Amanda Watford/Stateline)

By Amanda Watford

For years, the psychoactive compound kratom has been sold across much of the United States as an herbal supplement, available in powders, capsules and extracts with few of the restrictions applied to controlled substances.

But the market is changing. Products containing a potentially dangerous kratom derivative known as concentrated 7-hydroxymitragynine, or 7-OH, and other chemically modified kratom compounds are increasingly being sold alongside traditional kratom leaf products, prompting state lawmakers and federal regulators to reconsider how the substances should be regulated.

The evolution has put states in the middle of a difficult policy question: how to address concerns about increasingly potent kratom-related products without treating traditional kratom leaf the same way.

The state-owned Bank of North Dakota has launched a pilot program for Roughrider Coin, a dollar-backed digital asset that uses blockchain technology. 

Monitor reporter Jacob Orledge joins host Craig Blumenshine to discuss how the stablecoin technology may help complete financial transactions more quickly and the four North Dakota banks and credit unions that are participating. 

But questions remain about how the technology will work, what risks it may carry, and whether it will eventually affect everyday banking customers. 

EARLIER ND MONITOR NEWS AND COMMENTARY
FROM STATES NEWSROOM

Voters angry over the rising cost of groceries and other items due to tariffs could be expressing their dissatisfaction in the midterm elections. (Photo by Ming Tang Tung/Getty Images)

By Ashley Murray

Rebecca Myers lives in one of the nation’s most hotly contested congressional districts, and tariffs were on her mind as she voted early and in-person in Suffolk, Virginia in late September.

Myers is among a growing number of voters found to be taking their anger about affordability to the polls this midterm election and blaming President Donald Trump’s tariffs as a culprit for rising expenses. Public opinion surveys bear out Myers is far from alone in making the connection.

Thanks for reading North Dakota Monitor. Did you know our weekend digest is also free? Sign up here. And if you enjoyed today’s edition, please forward to a friend. Increasing our readership helps us cover more news.